OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has strong words for the former board members who abruptly fired him late last November. “[A]ll those people that I feel, like, really f—ed me and f—ed the company were gone, and now I had to clean up their mess,” he told Bloomberg in a wide-ranging interview. Just over a year […] © 2024 TechCrunch. All rights reserved. For personal use only.
The main conceptual idea of the article is that OpenAI's former CEO, Sam Altman, is publicly criticizing the board members who fired him, alleging their actions were unfounded and driven by a power struggle.
Altman claims the board reversed its decision after pressure, leading him to agree to return only if the entire board resigned. He also reveals intriguing details about OpenAI's past, such as a potential $42/month subscription fee for ChatGPT. He hints at future developments regarding OpenAI's chip plans, but the article focuses primarily on the contentious firing and Altman's grievances.
Essentially, the article paints a picture of internal conflict and betrayal within OpenAI's leadership.
The main conceptual idea of the article is that OpenAI's former CEO, Sam Altman, is publicly criticizing the board members who fired him, alleging their actions were unfounded and driven by a power struggle. Altman claims the board reversed its decision after pressure, leading him to agree to return only if the entire board resigned. He also reveals intriguing details about OpenAI's past, such as a potential $42/month subscription fee for ChatGPT. He hints at future developments regarding OpenAI's chip plans, but the article focuses primarily on the contentious firing and Altman's grievances. Essentially, the article paints a picture of internal conflict and betrayal within OpenAI's leadership.
